404 Error - page not found
We're sorry, but the page you are looking for doesn't exist.
You can go to the homepage



Robinson Outdoor Products LLC, the maker of ScentBlocker, introduces the ScentBlocker 1.5 Performance Shirt. Because when it comes to lightweight performance, next to nothing means everything.

At its core, the ScentBlocker 1.5 Performance Shirt is made from ultralightweight, breathable, technical fabric with 4 Direction Stretch and Microwick to keep the wearer cool and dry. It also incorporates an advanced S3 antimicrobial treatment to reduce odor-causing bacteria. This keeps garments smelling fresher, longer. But the foundation of this innovative product is ScentBlocker’s revolutionary new synthetic Trinity Technology that adsorbs human odor like nothing else.

Composed of a patented polymeric resin that took more than 10 years to perfect, Trinity has properties that provide qualities unattainable in other scent-adsorption technologies; it’s lighter by volume, exhibits stronger attraction for human/organic odors, and lasts longer over the life of a garment. Testing shows that Trinity even leapfrogged the efficacy benchmark of their own industry leading Cold Fusion carbon odor-adsorption capacity. And by leveraging ScentBlocker’s proprietary application process, Trinity Technology is fused into the fabric of the garment — in this case, the ScentBlocker 1.5 Performance Shirt.

“The significance of what this means to a hunter is obvious,” says Mike Swan, Director of Marketing.  “When you start with a material that adsorbs more odor, you can achieve impressive scent control performance in lighter garments with less loading. This is where Robinson Outdoor Products innovation shines through with our new Trinity technology. Application of this synthetic polymer on new technical fabrics results in absolutely lighter, more comfortable and more user-friendly scent control hunting clothing than ever before.”

As a component of ScentBlocker’s System Layers, the 1.5 Performance Shirt is classified as Layer 1, meaning it can be worn next to the skin by itself, or as a base layer under other garments.

Hunting with scent control has never been like this, and no one else has it. ScentBlocker’s 1.5 Performance Shirt — the hunting garment that no one dared dream of. Until now.

1.5 Performance Long-sleeve Shirt

NEW ScentBlocker Trinity Technology — Patent Pending

First of its kind! Full ScentBlocker technology in a shirt! Provides an extremely lightweight and breathable product.

Great for layering with ScentBlocker System Layer 2 and 3 garments

S3 antimicrobial technology to aid in odor control

4 Direction Stretch comfort

Microwick technology moves moisture away from the body

Crewneck style shirt

Thumbholes for easy layering

System Layer 1

Colors: RealTree Xtra, Mossy Oak Break-Up Infinity

Sizes: M–2XL

Have you seen this GoPro waterfowl hunting video?

Though it’s a couple years old by now, this GoPro waterfowl hunting film is pretty fantastic.

Uploaded by Ben Potter, it uses some great angles and high-speed capture to depict hunting at its best.

This was uploaded before the recent sportsmen’s mount released by GoPro, making it that much cooler thanks to the ingenuity.

It’s videos like this one that likely inspired GoPro to go ahead with their new mount.

Do you plan to shoot hunting videos this fall with a GoPro or similar camera?


Wild Man Andrew Ucles is indeed wild: he catches animals with his bare hands.

Us hunters rely on our gear to get us through the season, be it a trusty rifle, a sturdy bow, ammunition of choice, and plenty more.

Andrew Ucles uses, well, his bare hands. He’s not actually hunting animals, but catching them on his YouTube channel Andrew Ucles.

That’s either super awesome, or incredibly crazy. Maybe it’s a combo of both.

You’d like to think Ucles is trained professionally, and uses his vast experience in the wild to fight the “tameness” that he believes has made us humans disconnect from our roots.

Whatever side you’re on, that’s certainly a must-see video. And those dance moves!

Do you think people should chase and capture animals this way? Is it more or less ethical than hunting with weapons?


Climate change.

Those two words will spark some very heated debates these days. If you understand climate change to be true, then there are some very far-reaching implications on what must be done to curb the effects of it. Our two major political parties are at odds on how to deal with the issue. This isn’t a political forum, though. You’re here to read about fishing. Warmer water this summer from El Niño is going to change my fishing dramatically. While it will be fun, I’m a little worried about the aftereffects next year. It would be devastating to think what it will be like if this is the new normal.

Writer Todd Tanner of Hatch Magazine asks himself about this new normal, and explores how will it impact anglers.

fly-fishing-brown-trout_GnG“Luckily, though, there are still a few guys around who will look you straight in the eye and say, eloquently and to the point, ‘It’s been too goddamned hot for too long and the river has gone off.’” — John Gierach, Sex, Death, and Fly-Fishing

I cut my fly fishing teeth on John Gierach, and when he first published those words back in 1990, it all seemed innocent enough. Sure, ’88 was a hot son-of-a-gun, and the legendary waters around Yellowstone were beaten up by the heat in ways that nobody back then ever anticipated. Still, it seemed like an anomaly. Weather does crazy stuff. Some years are wet, others are dry; some are hot, some are cold, and some, on those occasions when the fishing gods happen to smile down from on high, are classic ‘Goldilocks’ just right. That’s how it always worked, and nobody I knew back in the early ‘90s ever considered that things might end up differently.

Fast forward to 2014, though, and any mention of extreme weather starts to sound ominous.

“Fluctuations in the weather used to be just that, but now, with everyone looking over their shoulders at global climate change, there’s the fear that any extreme could become the new normal. And when you guide fishermen for a living, the thought of your rivers drying up is the stuff of nightmares.”

Photos: Hatchfly Magazine (top); Gink and Gasoline (above)


Brush up on the history of camping.

The surest sign that a society has attained a certain level of affluence is when its well-to-do members turn the life-or-death labor of the past into their recreation.

Food gathering, once the great struggle of humanity, becomes weekend fishing or hunting trips. The slow plodding progress of boots pounding the ground between point A and point B becomes hiking. The jarring management of an unruly and remarkably stupid ungulate becomes horseback riding.

Perhaps most “primal” of all is total emersion into the landscape, actually uprooting oneself from the air conditioning and plumbing of the suburbs to live in the wilderness. This ultimate rebellion against modern softness is what we term “camping,” and it remains one of the most popular outdoor activities in the US.

Fundamentally, “recreational” camping is a recent invention, existing only in opposition to our relatively modern idea of housing. If you’re a hunter-gatherer or a nomadic horseman riding the steppes, it’s not camping, it’s just bedding down for the night.

Similarly for pre-industrial societies, with their wood-fired heating, walls and roofs made of insulation-free natural products, and lack of indoor plumbing, camping was not a recreational activity; it was a (hopefully temporary) hardship you endured if you didn’t have any better shelter. But, beginning in the mid to late 1800s, our concept of how people and nature should interact changed, and the idea of camping as an enjoyable and indeed important part of life infiltrated the public psyche.

The Victorian era in Britain (roughly 1830s-1900) was marked by the rapid industrialization of many manufacturing and extractive processes, and concomitant with this revolution was an explosion in urbanization, with power, money, and population becoming more and more centrally located in cities. This process, begun in England, soon expanded to the continent and, eventually, America.

This “progress” was met with some ambivalence by many people who felt that capital-M “Man” was somehow diminished, not merely physically but also morally and spiritually, by his estrangement from the countryside and the outdoors. Out of this this uncomfortable milieu of rapid social and economic change comes much of our great outdoor writing and philosophizing, things like Thoreau’s Walden, Emerson’s transcendental naturalism, and a whole slew of manuals and guides to the “Manly” outdoor sports of mountaineering, hunting, boating, and hiking.

The first manual on camping was produced by an Englishman, although his formative camping experiences all occurred in the American West. The man who would become the “Father of Camping,” Thomas Hiram Holding (1844-1930), began his outdoor life in 1853 when, with his parents, he camped for five weeks along the banks of the Mississippi before embarking on a wagon train trip westward.
Camping on the plains, they encountered buffalo herds, soon to be hunted nearly into extinction. They continued on into the Rocky Mountains, eventually coming to a stop in August, and then the next year travelled back east as part of another wagon train.

Harding returned to England and became a tailor in the vast smog-choked metropolis of London. Seeking refuge from the urban chaos, he and friends would canoe or bicycle through the countryside, hauling their gear and camping out as they travelled. One such trip through the wilds of Ireland in the 1880s became the basis for Holding’s book “Cycle and Camp in Connemara” in 1898. This work established Holding as the preeminent expert on camping in the UK, leading him to write the first guide to recreational camping ever written, the aptly named “The Camper’s Handbook” in 1908.

The “Father of Camping,” Thomas Hiram Holding (1844-1930)

The “Father of Camping,” Thomas Hiram Holding (1844-1930)

In addition to being an entertaining and well-written bit of camping advice, the book is an interesting historical document that provides a unique glimpse into the world of camping before our high-tech, specialized gear came onto the scene.

Not coincidentally, 1908 also saw the foundation of the Boy Scout Association in England, under Robert Baden-Powell, who would eventually become the President of the society founded by Holding, of the Camping Club of Great Britain and Ireland. The scouting movement was founded on the core idea that outdoorsmanship, camping, and woodcraft were an important part of a boy’s moral development, and quickly spread to the United States.

By 1910, the Boy Scouts of America had been founded and granted a congressional charter; the Girl Scouts of America followed soon-thereafter in 1912. Both these organizations introduced a range of American children and their parents to the world of camping, hiking, and other outdoor activities, coinciding with the establishment of some of the first National Parks.

The next great boost in American camping culture came as a result of the Great Depression. Part of Roosevelt’s New Deal was the establishment of the Civilian Conservation Core, a government work relief program that employed, at its height, 300,000 people. The CCC specialized in providing unskilled manual labor for a variety of conservation and natural resource development programs.
The CCC would go on to produce more than 800 parks, many still in use today. All of these parks received improvements, including trails and developed campgrounds with amenities like shelters, fire pits, grills, and restroom facilities. The popularity of the CCC with the public resulted in increased awareness of the outdoor recreational available to American citizens. Camping soon became one of the quintessentially American vacations.

Camping as recreation continued through the post-WWII economic boom, particularly through car camping and with hard-top campers. The environmental movement of the 60s and 70s had some roots in camping culture as well, and increased interest in conservation and the appreciation of the outdoors fed back into increased interest in camping.

According to the Outdoor Industry Association’s 2012 Special Report on Camping, 42.5 million Americans over the age of six camped in 2011. It’s a remarkable testament to how rapidly our society has changed in just a short 150 years, and how human’s fascination with the outdoors and “getting back to nature” has tracked our simultaneously increasing reliance on modern technology and conveniences.

When did you start camping? What are your favorite things about it?

Photo (above): Wikimedia


Scoot and shoot turkey hunting can get you closer to your game bird, but is it worth it?

Turkey hunting is like any other game hunting these days: the innovations and new techniques are increasing fast, sometimes quicker than regulations can keep up.

But the scoot and shoot technique, actually revived from a much older hunting strategy, is bringing safety into question. Watch this video from MOJO TV and ask yourself, Would I do this?

Scoot and shoot hunting, or “flagging,” is becoming more popular by the season, but articles like this one from the Missoulan are analyzing its safety, especially if used outside of private property.

It adopts a Native American practice of mimicking the appearance of a game animal while in pursuit, employed in America’s early history for bison hunting. But when combined with today’s high-powered weaponry and lifelike decoy technology, the chances of being mistaken for a game animal by another hunter has increased considerably.

The video above shows hunters getting extremely close to turkeys, some even able to nearly grab them with their hands. But it also depicts plenty of running shots taken after the hunter spooked the bird, which is less than ideal.

The private land-only argument for scoot and shoot hunting may not hold enough weight either, as just about any landowner will attest to the trespassing and poaching issues.

Whether this style of hunting becomes something local and federal rule makers feel is necessary to involve themselves in remains to be seen.

Though the Missoulan article included various perspectives on the practice of scoot and shoot, we’ll leave you with one poignant one from National Wild Turkey Federation assistant vice president and wildlife biologist Ton Hughes, who said “I can’t really think of a better way to assure that someone’s going to get shot while turkey hunting.”

What’s your opinion? Is scoot and shoot hunting safe enough to trust? Or should there be regulations attached to it?